Daniel Kaiser
CV

I study when more reasoning is worth it.

PhD Fellow at Integreat and UiT The Arctic University of Norway. I work on test-time compute and reasoning efficiency in large language models.

Before that an MSc by Research at Oxford on an Oxford-Man Institute scholarship, a BSc at WU Vienna, and six years in quantitative finance and machine learning engineering in Zurich.

PhD ends in 2027. Open to research visits in spring 2027 and to postdoc and research roles from autumn 2027. Get in touch →

Lab
Fig. 0 Physarum polycephalum, live. It keeps the paths that pay off and withdraws from the rest. No brain involved. How it works →

Research

  1. Tokens saved within half an accuracy point of always-high effort: 17.8 percent with one setting per benchmark, 19.2 with text forecasts, 43.8 with per-question oracle-like choice tokens saved vs. always-high, within 0.5 accuracy points always high effort reference one setting per benchmark −17.8% + forecasts from question text −19.2% per question, oracle-like −43.8% the gap: model-specific, mostly unforecast
    When Is More Reasoning Worth It?
  2. Relative cost of Qwen3.5-27B against GPT-OSS-120B on ZebraLogic reverses from 4.49 times at low workload to 0.78 times at high workload 0.5× 1× 2× 4× equal cost 4.49× 0.78× low workload high workload tokens: Qwen3.5-27B ÷ GPT-OSS-120B, ZebraLogic
    Beyond Accuracy
  3. Fitted accuracy against task length for four reasoning models on CogniLoad 20 50 100 250 050100 statements N (log) % correct, fitted GPT-5 Qwen3-8B Qwen3-32B DeepSeek-R1
    CogniLoad

2026

When Is More Reasoning Worth It?

Under review · with Benjamin Ricaud

Across 597,744 scored responses from nine open models at every effort setting, choosing effort per question would save 43.8% of tokens within half an accuracy point of always thinking hard.

Essays and experiments

Background

  1. 2024 – PhD Fellow, Machine Learning · Integreat and UiT
  2. 2022 – 24 Machine learning and data engineering · Orderfox, CH Media and Smallpdf, Zurich
  3. 2020 – 21 Quant · Rothschild & Co, Zurich
  4. 2019 – 20 ML research scientist · avax / Deep Impact, Winterthur
  5. 2018 – 20 MSc by Research, Engineering Science · University of Oxford
  6. 2014 – 17 BSc Economics · WU Vienna

In progress

  • Whether a frozen language model can use another model’s internal states.
  • An open dataset of scored responses at every effort setting of nine models.
  • Forecasting where extra reasoning helps, model by model.
  • The thesis, one argument about single questions and single models.